Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
gregstoll
on Feb 8, 2009
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Rice professor sees probabilistic method revolutio...
Or just do everything twice - if it really runs seven times faster than "today's best technology" than it shouldn't be an issue.
It's a very interesting idea...wish they had more details in the article.
gojomo
on Feb 8, 2009
[–]
You might have to do it far more than 7 times to converge on a suitably reliable answer... but perhaps precise recomputation could be deferred to off-hours, or lagged batch processing, or after disputes, etc.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
It's a very interesting idea...wish they had more details in the article.