Internet Traffic Report, while a nice concept, is unfortunately very misleading.
Their sample size is extremely small, and most of those are permanently down.
Have a look through their list of north american routers and find one of them where packet loss has gotten worse as their main overall graph for packet loss would suggest - I've just been through them all and couldn't find one.
Agreed. I was surprised to see only one[1] of the "down" routers with any packet loss over the last 24 hours.
That said, it's still interesting how the overall traffic trends so sharply downwards. I wonder if they have more data than they are showing in the graphs.
I noticed a couple of days ago that some of our dns entries were mysteriously removed from level 3 servers which out of old habit are used for resolution (some of the ip's go back to uu-net/worldcom/mci)
Now the interesting bit is they were for private subnet ip's. They're working fine everywhere else.
Today the last of their dns servers removed the entries so I had users go to google (8.8.8.8) and all's well with our apps.
Level 3's entries for our external stuff is there, just the private subnet stuff is removed.
If others do this too and resolve with level 3....
As Ewantoo mentioned, ITR is pretty unreliable. We have found it works as a relative measure -- when their packet loss rises, we do indeed see consumer traffic fall, though usually not by the amount their graphs would indicate.
http://internettrafficreport.com/namerica.htm
It seems like large portions of the internet are down.