Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

"Requirement 3.2: The app crashes"

Really? They've listed a 'requirement' as 'app crashes'?




No. "The app crashes" is the reason that it has failed on Requirement 3.2.

A bit of googling gives this which contains the full text of Requirement 3.2:-

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/Hh92158...


Also note that one of the common reasons for failing Requirement 3.2 now includes a reference to using CurrentAppSimulator that wasn't in the one linked in the original article.

I guess the OP just got stung by being an early adopter and the FAQ/requirement pages not being anywhere near complete as not enough people had gone through the certification process for MSFT to find all of the common reasons for rejection.


FYI, the first requirement for the Apple App Store is the same:

2.1 Apps that crash will be rejected


The way it was written was as a requirement:

"Requirement 3.2: the app crashes"

3.2 as a reason something is rejected ("app crashes") makes more sense. I wasn't sure if they're written it that casually, as it was quoted as such.


Yes, presumably that was in a section of reasons for rejection. It would be rather silly to assume there was a requirement that apps crash.


I believe it makes sense, in the context of Windows. They want users to feel as if they're in a comfortable and familiar environment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: