A UX risk is that the prominent photos, as in your mockup, draw the eye and activate a visual mode of thought with specific concrete images. Appreciation of poetry also tries to trigger visual thoughts, but through words and imagination/ambiguity instead. So the concrete visuals might interfere with literary appreciation. (Consider also: often the most-appreciated text appears bare on a plain page.)
This is just a hunch, and you could perhaps test an imagery-heavy look against a spartan text-centric presentation, and see which draws more of the exact kinds of reading/engagement you want.
I read the domain first as "po"-"three", and thought of Edgar Allen Poe, but with a little thought can see it as "po"-"eh"-"three". As that, it is effectively short and memorable... I think it could work well.
I don't think you're going to get people to pronounce your site "poe-uh-three".
If that was your intention you might want to rethink the name. I read the name as "poh-three", which frankly meant nothing to me.
Thanks. I get mixed opinions with the domain name. Some like it, some not so much. The initial idea was along "Poe3, Poetry by 3 people".
One reason I like it is that it is very short. Even with random alphabets, four letter domains are hard to come by. eg: www.poe3.com/123 (123rd poem), www.poe3.com/jeswin (my profile).
This is mostly targeted at casual users. More than making great poems, it might be about the social, collaborative aspect of writing something. Actually various forms of poetry (haiku, free verse..) aren't the only options available, I also added "Six word story" as an option.
This is just a hunch, and you could perhaps test an imagery-heavy look against a spartan text-centric presentation, and see which draws more of the exact kinds of reading/engagement you want.
I read the domain first as "po"-"three", and thought of Edgar Allen Poe, but with a little thought can see it as "po"-"eh"-"three". As that, it is effectively short and memorable... I think it could work well.
Good luck!