Same thing with .NET. When I see these things I wonder, is it that recruiters really have no clue of what they are asking or are they doing it to "catch" the kind of people who like to bluff/lie on their resume?
Given how many programmers are out there, it wouldn't be too beneficial to create a job posting that catches, a couple dozen at a time, the job-seekers who are padding their credentials.
And some of the applicants are presumably thinking something like "I'm as familiar with this as I'd need to be to perform the job. And I'm not going to mouth off to HR about how they don't know how long Java has been in existence. So I might as well apply."
Well, if I was to apply to such a job and saw this kind of mistake, I would point it out in the best way I could.
E.g. "I've been developing in XX language since it was released", "The technology has been available for X years and I started using it shortly after it was made public".
Well, im not a native English speaker so I'm probably a bit short on vocabulary to express it here. But stuff like that, shows that you know what you're talking about without telling them in their faces that they don't.
Apparently, Web 3.0 is the logical progression of web 2.0 for a generation of recruiters who picked the impression that the higher the version tag, the better a system is. Reckless protologism ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neologism#Protologism) rampant in blogosphere is to be blamed, to an extent.
I installed web 3.0 but it crashes whenever my hyperspace drive goes into warp mode so I downgraded back to web 2.6 until the service patch is released.
