no, not a problem. i am agreeing with you now. curious, what should i call it in... | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

undershirt on Sept 6, 2012 | parent | context | favorite | on: Accurate remake of Pac-Man in JavaScript

no, not a problem. i am agreeing with you now. curious, what should i call it instead? perhaps, faithful? or near-perfect?

heykoo on Sept 11, 2012 [–]

I have no idea, im afraid. I like the thought of an "ambitious reproduction", but "awesome" works just as well :)

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact