Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Indeed, fair point. But I think PHP's omnipresence is no longer the great advantage it once was. Its so easy to learn Ruby and deploy to heroku.



One hosting site that's backed by another hosting company that has a history of huge, extended outages does not make ruby or rails "omnipresent"

I seriously question anyone who uses heroku for production anything.


Right, but you're not using shared hosting for production either.


I have sites hosting on shared hosting providers that have better uptime then Heroku.

They aren't big sites. Hell, they are little sites, with barely a trickle of traffic. But that traffic results in real, paying customers.


I don't know where this idea of heroku having poor uptime is from. Heroku has excellent uptime - even during the ec2 outage most sites had very little actual downtime.


> I don't know where this idea of heroku having poor uptime is from.

Heroku's uptime.


Looks pretty good from here: https://status.heroku.com/past


Plenty of php based web sites (not web apps, sites) use shared hosting




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: