Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That it circumvents Yao’s conjecture by being non-greedy contradicts the article. Is the article wrong or is your understanding of the paper? I don’t know, just want to see if you’re noticing something the article’s authors don’t know.





Can you elaborate?

From the article:

> Farach-Colton, Krapivin and Kuszmaul wanted to see if that same limit also applied to non-greedy hash tables. They showed that it did not by providing a counterexample, a non-greedy hash table with an average query time that’s much, much better than log x.


Sibling comment above says funnel hashing is greedy, elastic hashing was the non-greedy method that did even better.



Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: