Old Lyme resident here, high school class of 82 - it was the younger siblings of my classmates who were getting "Lyme arthritis" starting in the late 70s or maybe 1980.
Like most of the populated Northeast, most the area was cleared farmland or grazing land until WWI or maybe WWII - all those stone walls in the middle of the woods used to be borders between open fields. I don't think there was an ecosystem that could support Lyme disease near where people lived until maybe the 70s - the cycle needs both deer and mice, in proximity to humans to get infected, and you're not going to get either of them on open land that's grazed or under cultivation.
So Lyme disease could have been around long before that, farther into the woods, and probably wouldn't have been noticed by people who had good enough doctors to figure out what was going on, or were healthy (rich?) enough for the symptoms of Lyme disease to be considered something out of the ordinary.
The fact that Lyme disease exists in Europe already seemed to indicate that it's been around a very long time, but this finding adds more evidence. For that matter, I wonder if it's yet another disease that was introduced to the Americas by Europeans?
I actually was under the impression that Lyme disease was a new world disease introduced to Europe after contact, but it seems it was endemic to both continents for thousands of years prior, not clear where it originated as the sources contradict each other. Seems like Europe is more likely.
>In all, 33 different combinations of the housekeeping genes were found. The study's findings appear to show that Borrelia burgdorferi originated in Europe but that the species has been present in North America for a long time. The researchers suggest its re-emergence there in the 1970s occurred after the geographic territory of the tick that carries the bacteria expanded, for example through the restoration of woodland.
>A team of researchers led by the Yale School of Public Health has found that the Lyme disease bacterium is ancient in North America, circulating silently in forests for at least 60,000 years—long before the disease was first described in Lyme, Connecticut, in 1976 and long before the arrival of humans.
Like most of the populated Northeast, most the area was cleared farmland or grazing land until WWI or maybe WWII - all those stone walls in the middle of the woods used to be borders between open fields. I don't think there was an ecosystem that could support Lyme disease near where people lived until maybe the 70s - the cycle needs both deer and mice, in proximity to humans to get infected, and you're not going to get either of them on open land that's grazed or under cultivation.
So Lyme disease could have been around long before that, farther into the woods, and probably wouldn't have been noticed by people who had good enough doctors to figure out what was going on, or were healthy (rich?) enough for the symptoms of Lyme disease to be considered something out of the ordinary.
The fact that Lyme disease exists in Europe already seemed to indicate that it's been around a very long time, but this finding adds more evidence. For that matter, I wonder if it's yet another disease that was introduced to the Americas by Europeans?