Get them a Roth IRA. Put $7k in it each year as long as you can. Invest the Roth in an index fund, dividend fund, or straight up picks. Have them put into the fund as soon as they are able (summer jobs, etc)
If you have enough, buy another property. Your kids can live in it or manage it later.
Put stuff in trusts or be sure they can manage it effectively. The thing you most want (probably) is for them to be secure into their old age, long after you are gone. But they will start feeling secure by middle age, and you will all be happier.
The idea that most people just have an extra $7k a year sitting around to put into a retirement account they won't be able to access for decades seems pretty out of touch. A lot of people are just getting by. Additionally, if you live in a high CoL area, you might be prevented from contributing to a Roth even though most of your income goes to living expenses.
Some of the advice thrown around in this thread is so out of touch.
"Just get a high paying job".
"I never worry about healthcare because of my employer".
"Just put $7,000 away into a retirement account and $10,000 into a 529 every year. What's the problem?"
And even if I'm in a position to do that, the problem is that there are millions of fellow Americans (the majority) that don't have these "luxuries".
I like a quote from Stephen Dubner when he closes his episodes of Freakonomics podcast:
> "Take care of yourself, and if you can, someone else, too."
I'm on HN. I work at a Series-C YC startup. I previously worked at another VC-back SV startup. I've even tried numerous startups of my own. But I'm also a part of a broader community of Americans and I want all Americans (and all people, if possible) to do well.
That's probably why he suggested a roth. $7k might be too much, but you can withdraw your own contributions from a roth without penalty. This makes it a great way to save for people early in their career, especially if they are in lower tax brackets that wouldn't benefit greatly from traditional ira deductions anyway.
Not only that, but even if you could put $7K every year into an IRA, and even if the investment returned a steady 7% per year risk free (HAHA!), in 30 years, it's grown to ~$660K, which, sure, is a nice chunk of change, but at a 3% draw down rate, you'll need to live on less than $20K/year. You'll need to be really frugal. Move to a super low cost of living area and go back to eating ramen. And don't get seriously sick or injured. And don't have dependents to house, feed, and educate...
That's probably why he suggested a roth. $7k might be too much, but you can withdraw your own contributions from a roth without penalty. This makes it a great way to save for people early in their career, especially if they are in lower tax brackets that wouldn't benefit greatly from traditional ira deductions anyway.
The person you're replying to wasn't making a general point, but was specifically replying to someone who said their income was in the top percentiles. So probably not someone just getting by.
You can't put money into an IRA unless the primary holder of said IRA has income, and you cannot put more into said IRA than was earned by the primary holder of the IRA.
My young children earn $0 annually. I wish I could do this. 3 IRAs is cheaper than daycare by about half.
If you have enough, buy another property. Your kids can live in it or manage it later.
Put stuff in trusts or be sure they can manage it effectively. The thing you most want (probably) is for them to be secure into their old age, long after you are gone. But they will start feeling secure by middle age, and you will all be happier.