I logged into the sampler site and toyed around with it in the different browsers (IE 9, Firefox 15, Chrome ??) on Windows 7 with only input boxes behaving in different ways. Escape key could be used in IE to cancel input but not in others. On my iPod Touch, Safari could not render anything and Opera Mini could only show the front page but did not allow interaction. On my Nook Color, the Browser app also could not render the site either.
Overall a nice little library with most of the expected widgets. Too many issues with the older mobile browsers that I'm not sure I would use it just yet but I would give it serious consideration as it does look like it might improve the experience for business apps we currently deploy in-house. I would probably need to actually download and toy with it for a more complete experience.
Which OS version is on your iPod Touch? We tested with iOS 5.1 mainly, so I'm not sure how well things work with a 4.x one. We've also done a bit of testing on Android versions, and it's quite a headache working around WebKit bugs there.
iPod Touch was 3.1.2 (about 2 years old) which I will readily admit is rather old but I have reasons for sticking to it on that device. I don't believe 5+ is available for my hardware. Now I don't really expect it to work but it would be one of those nice-to-haves if it did. The Nook I think is up-to-date as of a week or 2 ago.
My company does not enforce a standard browser but iPad and Android Tablets would be expected for anything I adopt as well as the standard Windows browsers. I'm not aware of anything that works well everywhere and gives a nice experience which is what this framework tries to do so. Anyway I totally appreciate the work and understand the difficulties involved.
You need to draw the line somewhere. 'Broad' support is good. 'Everything' support is futile, for the feature set desired in a mobile application framework, with the resources the Enyo team has.
Enyo is good at creating 'apps' - often things delivered in a PhoneGap-like container or something with defined browser support like Chrome Web Store.
Its probably not the general framework for any and all website development needing to support all platforms.
We've picked this for our mobile presence, the real selling point for me was the pretty much native speed animations out of the box, which is a killer on things like jquery mobile. There might be more work up front for us as there is less reuse possible from our web front-end but that is our issue to solve once, having a clunky, unresponsive UI is a problem every user would suffer every time.
Kudos to the Enyo team for making this happen (despite it being widely and inaccurately reported that Google hired "the whole team" a few months back).
Clearly there are still some very talented engineers working there, can't wait to see what they do with Open webOS 1.0 later this year.
Overall a nice little library with most of the expected widgets. Too many issues with the older mobile browsers that I'm not sure I would use it just yet but I would give it serious consideration as it does look like it might improve the experience for business apps we currently deploy in-house. I would probably need to actually download and toy with it for a more complete experience.