The reason scientists do peer review is captured well by the Mike Tyson quote, “Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face,” which we can rephrase as, "Everyone has a theory until they undergo peer review."
The point is that your theory is almost certainly wrong, but you won't find out how wrong it is unless you describe it in enough detail for others to check it.
No. The point is standing outside the ring shit-talking about how you have the best punch is just BS, and you know it - otherwise you would have published something.
You're talking about an amateur conjecture that no-one has seen as though it has some relevance to a discussion about physics.
That's just nonsense. My analogy about boxing is not shit-talking, it's pointing out what you're actually doing: talking a big game with no ability to back it up.
I'm doing you a favor by pointing that out, because if you somehow don't realize it, it might help prevent you from turning into a complete crackpot.
Aw, lighten up a bit. I'm just on HN having fun discussing Physics, because it's something I love. But it's super nice of you to take so much time and effort to encourage people to publish.
The reason scientists do peer review is captured well by the Mike Tyson quote, “Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face,” which we can rephrase as, "Everyone has a theory until they undergo peer review."
The point is that your theory is almost certainly wrong, but you won't find out how wrong it is unless you describe it in enough detail for others to check it.