Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Long term this would be still easier to make really sustainable than mars mision.

1) Power:

- power can be from nuclear reactors similar like with nuclear submarines

- you can drill down near some geothermal water

- you can still deploy some floating solar panels with 200m cable linked to habitat and fold back similar like kite in case tsunami

- you can put habitat nearby some water currents (e.g. nearby some 2 underwater mountains/islands and you will have water current because of tidal waves) and deploy some power kite or hydro turbine

2) Oxygen + energy

- just make electrolysis on water molecule to get both oxygen and hydrogen

3)

- grow some seaweed food

- grow fishes and other sea food

Sure this is still hard to pull off but at least 1 order of magnitude easier than on mars. On earth you don't have to worry about gravity, lack of water, lack of geothermal power, radiation from space, protection from micro meteors, -73C temperature during the night on mars (deep water on earth even 200m below is not frozen but between 0-3C). Humanity after 10 years of living underwater can still try to go back to land after things gets better post asteroid impact.




Oh sure. Colonies on Mars are a complete fantasy right now. They start and end with Mars's lack of a magnetic field.

could we create a self-sufficient habitat underwater? Probably. But given that it would lack key abilities (heavy industry for example) it would inevitably decay (Probably quite quickly.)


Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but wouldn’t you need a helium mix at 200 meters?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: