Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

We do not know what secrets he had for the witness stand. It could have been internal directives like "F*** copyright" or worse.



Why would that matter?

What they and other companies are doing with available publicly available data (whether copyrighted or not) is a matter of fact and subject to law. The opinion of their executives on copyright regimes is pretty much irrelevant.


Intent matters in court.


[flagged]


Copyright theft? Spew much copyright propaganda. Even courts don't call it theft[0]

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowling_v._United_States_(19...




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: