Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No, they didn't. At least look at the data before making such a bigoted statement.



Yes, we did lose a generational cohort.

There is a reason that the quilt is so large[1].

[1] https://www.npr.org/2012/06/27/155868611/pieces-of-aids-quil...


100k out of 200 million (US)? Out of 5 billion (worldwide)?

The flu makes us lose five "generational cohorts" every year, then.


Intersectionality.

100k out of *how many out homosexual individuals during that era in the area being studied*?

And it's not just raw numbers, either. It's how many lives / families were impacted in this unique way.

To add, it's also 100k that were almost entirely in a single demographic that was explicitly and implicitly being harmed by those in power during that era.


I want to add more. The whole “30 is gay death” expression, I bet, especially since it’s not really a thing anymore, was greatly influenced by there being very few gay people over 30. Because the rest were dead.


>Intersectionality.

Nah, just elementary school Math.

It was around 1%, a considerable morbidity but still very far from losing "a complete generational cohort".


Hey btw I absolutely did mean "a generational cohort of lgbtq people" not the broader total population. Which would make no sense, so I assumed no one would interpret my meaning that way. Thanks for calling me a bigot and then starting a fight with these other people about it though.


A multiplication and a division is starting a fight nowadays?

>a generational cohort of lgbtq people

That's where the 1% figure comes from. If you look at the whole population it is more like 0.0001%.

Sorry if Math hurt your feelings.

Btw, bigot means a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief or an opinion, which seems relevant.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: