On: Polyamory doesn't liberate; monogamy doesn't protect

[t-writescode]

> but being real sex is the thing that most often differentiates romantic partnerships from other close relationships

I don't actually agree. I think "willingness and continued intention to follow this person and live with them ever still, including the sacrifices that come along with it" tends to be something that connects more with relationships traditionally seen as romantic.

It's something that would separate a very close friendship from, for example, a "Queer Platonic Relationship", which could very arguably be romantic.

[archagon → t-writescode]

People devote themselves to their non-romantic loved ones, including parents and siblings.

[Spivak → archagon]

Sure but the thing that matters is when you make a bond with someone who isn't a member of your family.