Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The notion that rejecting the scientific method is necessarily bad thing is epistemically unsound, and a rather provocative topic.





And yet I did not state this, and it seems you're rounding my position to an easier one to dismiss.

I don't reject non-scientific scholarship. But I see the focus in some disciplines a little like twinkies and soda: a bit of them can be fine and maybe even be good in some circumstances (brings joy; maybe as a recovery item for some diabetic conditions). But my feeling is that some of these disciplines have indexed a bit too much on twinkie and soda.


I think we are very much on the same general page!

Ah, I think I misread the intent of what you wrote—apologies!

Not entirely I bet!

I think of science in much the same way that you think of other disciplines.


Do you have another method in mind that is epistemically sound other than the scientific method?

I'm more interested in broad capabilities, not only just epistemic soundness.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: