Exactly, that's the problem - sports bodies adjusting their eligibility criteria for the nominally female category to accommodate inclusion of a subset of males, just because these males desire to be women.
That actual female women might not want to compete against these males typically hasn't been considered. And where it has, it's usually because female athletes have spoken up against it, and they've almost always been censured and penalized for doing so.
Plus, there's no evidence that testosterone suppression can weaken the male body to a state where male advantage is obliterated. The data gathered so far indicates the opposite. Not that every competition organizer even requires this, for some events it's nothing more than a self-declaration of woman or man, with no verification done at all.
The whole approach to this is broken, as it disadvantages the very people who the women's category is intended for: female athletes.
That actual female women might not want to compete against these males typically hasn't been considered. And where it has, it's usually because female athletes have spoken up against it, and they've almost always been censured and penalized for doing so.
Plus, there's no evidence that testosterone suppression can weaken the male body to a state where male advantage is obliterated. The data gathered so far indicates the opposite. Not that every competition organizer even requires this, for some events it's nothing more than a self-declaration of woman or man, with no verification done at all.
The whole approach to this is broken, as it disadvantages the very people who the women's category is intended for: female athletes.