Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

In other words: they made good design decisions. If they hadn't made good design decisions, their design would be bad.



I think every other design that they have ever done apart from that Google search homepage has been horrible and bad. So that's why they lucked out on that first one.


I would definitely read an in-depth exploration of Google's design failures from someone informed & opinionated on the topic. I found this looking for such a thing: https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/81965/what-are-the-di...


I've read a bunch of stuff about their design and why it's so bad, including this one. Bottom line is you cannot scientifically manage your way to design. That is why in the future we are going to see designers with aesthetic sense become more and more useful as AI sort of like starts doing everything.


The first 4 flaws from the link above can definitely be "scientifically" managed even by people without aesthetic sense.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: