If that was the plan from the start I'd expect them to be more careful about dependences on reference counting and implicit allocations. It's more optimized than ObjC, but still has things like loops that iterate over a logical copy.
I take their old statements about replacing C and C++ as the same aspiration that Golang had to be a systems programming language.
I take their old statements about replacing C and C++ as the same aspiration that Golang had to be a systems programming language.