Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> PostgreSQL does not have the concept of in-memory tables.

Is that relevant though? Some benchmarks on the web show Postgres outperforming Redis in reads as well as low-volume writes (less than 1k key-value pairs), and Redis only beating Postgres for high volume key-value writes.




> Redis only beating Postgres for high volume key-value writes

I wonder what type of use cases have high volume writes.

Maybe queuing, locking and pub/sub ?


Usually none of them. Queuing is almost never high volume and rarely is pub sub.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: