You need to be completely out-of-your-mind if you think that commenters of this site ousted Mozilla's CEO (after 5 years). And even more madness coming after, blaming HNers for an even worse CEO. There is no guideline about entertaining crazy theories. What you said makes zero sense. The fact that nobody wants to engage on this silly comment of yours seriously tells more about you than us.
You both broke the site guidelines badly in this thread. Please don't do that in the future, and if you'd please avoid tit-for-tat spats in particular, we'd appreciate it.
If lying was outlawed, half of HN would be in jail, you can see absolute bullshit in comments on many front page posts.
> users/customers
Mozilla's customer was google, and now its advertisers. I am sure they are listening to them. What are the users gonna do, switch to chrome? Wait until ladybird becomes mature? The naïveté is riveting.
> So you are saying that the previous Mozilla's CEO was working there because of ideals, not the money? Making 7 million USD while the company you manage loses revenue is the stupidest idea of working for ideals I have ever heard of.
This is how the market works, if you have a position that people don't want to take you pay more money. At some point money becomes the main motivator - and ideology takes the backseat to monetizing the audience.
You both broke the site guidelines badly in this thread. Please don't do that in the future, and if you'd please avoid tit-for-tat spats in particular, we'd appreciate it.
What are you talking about? Seriously. Don't post rants while drunk.