People don't want 3P cookies tracking them around the web. They also don't want to pay to visit sites. Mozilla is trying to provide a middle path, I salute the effort.
Is everyone who claims the Internet cannot work without advertising only 20 years old? Why try to gaslight so many people who remember the Internet without advertising just fine. It was just a few decades ago!
I remember the BBS's, Compuserve, AOL, and the Internet before (ubiquitous) advertising. It was fun yet spartan.
In light of the alternatives (like paying for everything with discrete purchase or subscriptions), I'd prefer that advertising survive. Ideally with less invasive ways of detecting my interests.
My intention is certainly not to gaslight anyone. Not sure how you came to that conclusion.
There's nothing wrong with wanting advertising to survive. It's a creative powerhouse and a huge cultural influence.
But what most people really mean when they say that is: I want to preserve ways of coercing or tricking people into consuming content that they do not actually want to consume at the time of consumption.
And I think that is a very bad idea, regardless of the expectations people put into that ability.
> Intelligent employees of news organizations would learn from that but no
They did learn from it, that's why many "news" sites are now content-free entertainment, and why intelligent non-employees of news organizations complain that they're not providing news.