Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I kind of see your point, but they're clearly learning on the job, and AFAICT the mistakes didn't damage anyone else too badly.



imo, the way you first do something + your first responses to serious criticism are the most telling regarding character. because afterwards, you can just play the act of "we're sorry because the backlash was really big and we have to clean up".


>they're clearly learning on their job

They are experienced software developers coming from $300K jobs at Coinbase. As experienced developers they know the requirements in the Apache License 2.0. As former employees at highly regulated Fintech companies like Coinbase they know better than letting ChatGPT make up new legal texts.

They are cynical manipulators hiding behind a made up fictive "careless Gen Z tech bros" image.


They're VC funded software developers, gods in the image of mere mortals. There's probably nothing they are not experts in.


Crypto scammers turned AI scammers, the world continues to turn.


> [they worked at] Coinbase

I mean... crypto companies are well known for being chock full of decent and honest employees who aren’t zealots or bandwagon jumpers in any way, shape or form.

Just like a lot of recently created “AI” companies.


Coming from Coinbase isn't such the prestigious signal of integrity and hard work that that they seem to think it is.


Coinbase internally had the `oh anyone who wants to work on crypto would want to work at Coinbase, you are already at Coinbase, wow, look at you, such a good place you have for yourself` speech given out relatively often. Even after employees commented on how they think they are being underpaid.

The compensation is on the low-end when it comes to what Coinbase pays to its employees. They wronged their hires on multiple occasions with dilutions too. Many of these employees had strike prices that were above what Coinbase IPO'd at. They were relying on their options, otherwise their base pay was undermarket.


> As experienced developers they know the requirements in the Apache License 2.0.

I’ve worked at a company with hundreds of devs where I caught an obvious error (a reference to a section that did not exist) in the pre-employment agreement. To imply that most devs are carefully reading documentation in general, much less legalese, is laughable.


But when you're starting or running a business, carefully reading contracts is a critical activity for the success of the business. If the founders can't do this themselves, they should have their attorney do it for them. And if they don't have an attorney, that's a critical error as well and they need one ASAP.


> highly regulated Fintech companies like Coinbase

Um.


They are new grads




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: