With the continuing advancement of AI in terms of dealing with both buyers and sellers, the tools should focus on both the buyers and the sellers.
The need for an "agent" as such becomes an unnecessary cost, if you can get an "associate" from the equivalent of airtasker, with insurance covering their liability to do the "showings" for you, while AI can deal with most of the email or other notifications.
Would allow individuals to run their own auctions to achieve the best price, deal with the settlement and title transfer.
Make it a fixed cost service, not based on the house valuation, so that there is no incentive to manipulate suggested prices, but base it on algorithmic evaluation.
Love the idea of AI battlebots in such exchanges in the future, but the legals better be tied down.
The need for an "agent" as such becomes an unnecessary cost, if you can get an "associate" from the equivalent of airtasker, with insurance covering their liability to do the "showings" for you, while AI can deal with most of the email or other notifications.
Would allow individuals to run their own auctions to achieve the best price, deal with the settlement and title transfer.
Make it a fixed cost service, not based on the house valuation, so that there is no incentive to manipulate suggested prices, but base it on algorithmic evaluation.
Love the idea of AI battlebots in such exchanges in the future, but the legals better be tied down.