Yep, they claim it's a new blood group that was discovered, but then the body of the article seems to imply that this was known for decades. What's notable is there's a new blood test for the group.
Article feels like it was written in a hurry or partially written by AI with poor editing.
I’m glad to see someone mention this, I got a very strong “nice words in the wrong order” vibe from this article which is strange for something off the BBC.
Article feels like it was written in a hurry or partially written by AI with poor editing.