If the Supreme Court says the decision is in accordance with law - and they're the ones with the legal authority to make that assessment, and the Congress has done nothing to reprimand the Supreme Court and overrule their assessment, then the judge's decision, by definition, is in accordance with law.
The problem as I see it is you disagree with that assessment.
People disagree in democracies, it's a defining feature. There are good reasons to disagree with the judge's decision and its legality. That doesn't change the fact that the people having the power vested in them by the state think otherwise and are supporting the decision.
Appealing to a vigilante like Musk to settle your internal disagreements is not a wise move, my friend.
> If the Supreme Court says the decision is in accordance with law - and they're the ones with the legal authority to make that assessment, and the Congress has done nothing to reprimand the Supreme Court and overrule their assessment, then the judge's decision, by definition, is in accordance with law.
That's completely false and not how the law works in Brazil.
> The problem as I see it is you disagree with that assessment.
Because it's just plain false.
> Appealing to a vigilante like Musk to settle your internal disagreements is not a wise move, my friend.
Nobody is appealing for Musk, he's just one, of several people affected by that and reacting.
