Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I'm generally a Hanlon’s razor advocate. Never attribute to malice what can be sufficiently explained by incompetence.

With that said this example strains even my ability to justify the incompetence angle.






Hanlon's razor is significantly dulled by the presence of Larry Ellison.

Perhaps I can help... when Hanlon's Razor doesn't explain the malice/stupidity in play, you can always try the extending it with the following:

Hubbard's corollary to Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice or stupidity that which can be explained by moderately rational individuals following incentives in a complex system". (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor#Other_variati...

Or HN Nerdponx's simplification: "When money is at stake, never attribute to incompetence what could be attributed to greed." (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41066724)


Probably a kernel of malice (corruption, kickbacks) surrounded by a warm flesh of incompetence.

Grey's Law: "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice."



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: