> so you loose some battery capacity (for a given amount of lithium), but wind up with a beefier protective layer on your electrode and better longevity across subsequent charge cycles
If there's a capacity tradeoff, why not use a slightly modified chemistry (like how LTO is, for example)? Though I guess this article was more about the existence of the phenomenon rather than using it.
If there's a capacity tradeoff, why not use a slightly modified chemistry (like how LTO is, for example)? Though I guess this article was more about the existence of the phenomenon rather than using it.