On: Ubuntu's Plans To Implement UEFI SecureBoot: No GRUB2

[morsch]

If it is anti-competitive, then what? There's no Microsoft monopoly on ARM they could leverage, they own nothing of that market.

[setrofim_ → morsch]

I guess it depends how you define the market. One could argue that they're abusing their dominant position in "consumer operating system" market.

[gareim → morsch]

I thought it was that anti-competitive actions were illegal (or just heavily frowned upon?) and monopolies in and of themselves aren't bad, just if they abuse their power in an anti-competitive way.

[setrofim_ → gareim]

IIRC, it's basically has to be the combinations of the two. Monopolies aren't illegal in and of themselves. But neither are actions that may be deemed anti-competitive. It's only illegal when a monopoly (or a dominant player - doesn't have to be a monopoly) exploits its position to gain further advantage through anti-competitive actions.