A. The law in Brazil says any company needs a legal representative in the country. X does not.
B. Under hate speech and misinformation laws some accounts were asked to be removed. They did not.
C. Because the company wasn’t replying at all to court requests, they consider that obstruction of justice vs trying to appeal the court
D. As far as Starlink they consider it a “de facto economic group under the control of Elon Musk” which is mostly true.
Now as far as the Constitution, this is the Supreme court. So saying X has the right to judge the Supreme Court to be in breach of the Constitution, when they themselves are meant to make those decisions, is pretty nutty to me. It's like saying I don't agree with the abortion ban in Texas/Florida so I will continue to do them, since I don't accept Roe V Wave was overturned by Dobbs, so I will just do my own thing, keep doing abortions and f the court.
That's a good way to get yourself arrested, which is what happened here.
Instead you should look into why do you think this to be the truth?
Considering your posts were so egregious even the mods took action against them, you actually showed everyone you are most likely a bot/sockpuppet/radical of some sort.
