The website linked is for the The Resilient Anonymous Communication for Everyone (RACE) program. A government program to fund research is not a specification.
I assume you were originally responding to the proof of concept in the Github link? I mean, sure, maybe your criticisms are valid, but (to borrow a term from DARPA) they are non-responsive. If OP wanted to share that Github link and make it the focus of discussion, they would have done so. If you wanted to discuss that Github link, you should have been more clear that you were responding to something peripheral to the actual thing under discussion, which is the program, not the PoC.
In general, my response wasn't just to inform you, but because this is a common point of confusion when people share or discuss DARPA programs here. They are explicitly not prescribing a particular solution, even if sometimes a prior seedling effort or PoC is released alongside the solicitation. So don't take my response so personally; it was not only meant for you.
I assume you were originally responding to the proof of concept in the Github link? I mean, sure, maybe your criticisms are valid, but (to borrow a term from DARPA) they are non-responsive. If OP wanted to share that Github link and make it the focus of discussion, they would have done so. If you wanted to discuss that Github link, you should have been more clear that you were responding to something peripheral to the actual thing under discussion, which is the program, not the PoC.
In general, my response wasn't just to inform you, but because this is a common point of confusion when people share or discuss DARPA programs here. They are explicitly not prescribing a particular solution, even if sometimes a prior seedling effort or PoC is released alongside the solicitation. So don't take my response so personally; it was not only meant for you.