Yes it is a solution to a user who want to control their own moderation and curated environment.
You get your environment, and other people get theirs. The problem for the user who wants their own curated environment is solved.
> the people choosing the platform are choosing it because of the curation.
They would be free to have that curation for themselves in this circumstance where the curation choice is given to the user.
> If you don't like it
You are literally commenting on a thread where the judge ruled in a way that forces liability onto social media companies for not doing this.
So, the choice that social media companies now have is to either 1: give the moderation choice to the user. or 2: suffer very serious and significant liability.
I am fine with either of those situations, and instead it is you and those social media companies who will have to deal with the "If you don't like it" questions, because thats what the judge said.
> you're going to have to pay for your own platform
No, we can instead laugh when social media companies have to pay a bunch of money due to their liability, as this judge just ruled.
Yes it is a solution to a user who want to control their own moderation and curated environment.
You get your environment, and other people get theirs. The problem for the user who wants their own curated environment is solved.
> the people choosing the platform are choosing it because of the curation.
They would be free to have that curation for themselves in this circumstance where the curation choice is given to the user.
> If you don't like it
You are literally commenting on a thread where the judge ruled in a way that forces liability onto social media companies for not doing this.
So, the choice that social media companies now have is to either 1: give the moderation choice to the user. or 2: suffer very serious and significant liability.
I am fine with either of those situations, and instead it is you and those social media companies who will have to deal with the "If you don't like it" questions, because thats what the judge said.
> you're going to have to pay for your own platform
No, we can instead laugh when social media companies have to pay a bunch of money due to their liability, as this judge just ruled.