On: Pipe Syntax in SQL

[jmull]

The proposal here adds pipe syntax to SQL.

So it would be reasonable to call it SQL, if it gets traction. You want to see some of the big dogs adopting it.

That should at least be possible since it looks like it could be added to an existing implementation without significant disruption/extra complexity.

[cryptonector → jmull]

There may be trademark issues, but even if not, doing sufficient violence to the original thing argues for using a new name for the new thing.