First, part of the benefit of peer review is that two people have seen the code and have familiarity. Even if it's rubber stamping, if someone has actually looked at it, LGTM might be enough.
Second, even if PR only catches something 10% of the time, it catches the most obvious bugs.
First, part of the benefit of peer review is that two people have seen the code and have familiarity. Even if it's rubber stamping, if someone has actually looked at it, LGTM might be enough.
Second, even if PR only catches something 10% of the time, it catches the most obvious bugs.