Maybe, maybe not. It's a tiered system - you get the deluge at the unfiltered bottom and a narrower selection the more prestigious and selective the outlets / conferences / journals are.
Problem is, of course, that selection criteria are in large parts proxies, not measures of quality. With AI, those proxies become tainted and then you get an explosion of effort.
If anyone has a good recommendation for scalable criteria to assess the quality of papers (beyond fame haha) I'm all ears.
Problem is, of course, that selection criteria are in large parts proxies, not measures of quality. With AI, those proxies become tainted and then you get an explosion of effort.
If anyone has a good recommendation for scalable criteria to assess the quality of papers (beyond fame haha) I'm all ears.