Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Roughly 20 years ago a network engineer I worked with said - "We took a look and IPv4 had everything we want and need but the address space". Why the committees didn't just made it 128 bit and be done with it is beyond me.



They basically did. All the other changes are minor cleanups like getting rid of fields nobody uses, and realigning header bytes.

Except SLAAC, but that wasn't part of the original design anyway. That was an accident when some major vendor implemented SLAAC before it implemented DHCPv6. The plan was to keep DHCP.


The idea that IPv6 is basically just "IPv4 with more address bits" is so wildly incorrect I'm not even sure where to start.


You could start with one of the ways it isn't, apart from minor cleanups, and apart from SLAAC because it was already mentioned.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: