Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Is 128gb so much? My last workstation (not a laptop) had a 5950x and 128gb of DDR4 and that RAM is like 4 years old now.

I am not saying you will have it in an ultrabook form factor, but I had 32gb of ram in sandy bridge laptop (intel core i7 2700 ?) and 64 not that much later. That was like 10+ years ago. Those were desktop replacement and thicker style laptops, but not exactly unreasonable equipment.




I use a lenovo laptop, a t15g2 because of 4x dimm slots that let me fit 128gb of ram, and yes, I tend to use that even under linux. I tend to do work and personal business across this device, which includes full separate firefox profiles for each, usually 4-5, and it's not uncommon to see it or chrome/chromium actually using 60-70gb, not just reserved, of ram alone each connected to gapps, teams/orfice365, whatever needed for work.

Throw in almost always using a windoze vm for windoze things for another 8gb, at times other vm's using 4-8gb doing various things for testing, libreoffice with 20 complex spreadsheets, steam games, normal use really, all adds up to a lot of at minimum reserved memory far exceeding physical, at times things ballooning within that, and thus at times getting cranky to still oom occasionally.

I rather wonder who actually uses boxes with only 8gb of ram some still ship with.


> I rather wonder who actually uses boxes with only 8gb of ram some still ship with.

Everyone else? :) Joking aside, the majority of people buy the MacBook Air, mostly with the minimum spec. Apple is expensive.

If I didn't have to run docker or didn't store media locally, I could very easily use one.


But apple has like 5% market share. 8gb with windows is really rough. There are people who don't care or can't afford performance.


Not enough*


Yes, 128 GB of memory is a shitload.


Yes, even just 8 GB can be fine today depending on what you do.


I do stuff that uses all my RAM. New workstation has 192GB already had builds that pushed it to 180gb used. I am not alone.

I am not saying everyone needs that much, just that the bar for what warrants a dedicated server rack keeps going up and 128gb in a thick laptop seems practical.


Windows 10 on 8GB is borderline unusable. But Linux works just fine.


Windows 10 (and 11) works fine with 8 GB. You may be using applications that need more. The minimum requirement for 64-bit Windows 10 is only 2 GB, and even 4 GB can be workable depending on the application.


In my experience that is patently false.

Windows 10/11 with 8GB of ram is comfortable, using just Chrome... 4GB and it's in swap.

2GB would be unusable despite Microsoft's minimums, you will be swapping constantly.


64GB ddr5 memory modules don't even exist yet, so going 128GB would require four memory DIMMs.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: