Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I disagree. You seem to start from a premise that all people are honest, except those that aren't, but you don't work with or meet dishonest people, unless the employer sets himself up in an adversarial role?

As the other reply to your comment said: the world is not 'fair' or 'honest', that's just a lie told to children. Apart from geuinely evil people, there are unlimited variables that dictate people's behavior. Culture, personality, nutrition, financial situation, mood, stress, bully coworkers, intrinsic values, etc etc. To think people are all fair and honest "unless" is a really harmful worldview to have and in my opinion the reason for a lot of bad things being allowed to happen and continue (troughout all society, not just work).

Zero-trust in IT is just the digitized version of "trust is earned". In computers you can be more crude and direct about it, but it should be the same for social connections and interactions.




> You seem to start from a premise that all people are honest

You have to start with that premise otherwise organizations and society fail. Every hour of every day, even people in high security organizations have opportunities to betray the trust bestowed on them. Software and processes are about keeping honest people honest. The dishonest ones you cannot do too much about but hope you limit the damage they can cause.

If everyone is treated as dishonest then there will eventually be an organizational breakdown. Creativity, high productivity, etc... do not work in a low/zero trust environment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: