On: Our website is closed on Sundays

[killingtime74]

Your question on right for the corporation to bear arms is interesting but moot. The members of the corporation already have that right.

[reverius42 → killingtime74]

If that's the case, why is it not moot when it comes to freedom of speech?

[killingtime74 → reverius42]

A corporation cannot bear arms without a physical person/object (drone?) doing so, whereas speech can be done by the corporation as a purely legal entity. I guess the closest is a corporation can hire someone to do it, but that someone ultimately is a person/drone. Employment is not bearing arms.