On: The rise of the camera launched a fight to protect...

[jorvi]

> That does bother me, but I choose to ignore that part except to make sure that my friends and family don't do it.

…which is a million times more damaging to you personally than Coca-Cola knowing you are(n’t) an attractive target to advertise to.

What is more harmful to you: a half-naked photo of you going viral, or your last 100 gas tank refills logged into an image database?

[JohnFen → jorvi]

That depends on what your concern is. A half-naked photo (which wouldn't bother me, but for the sake of argument...) might be more damaging short term, but the other, when combined with all the other data collection, is more damaging long term.

[ta1243 → jorvi]

> What is more harmful to you: a half-naked photo of you going viral, or your last 100 gas tank refills logged into an image database?

The latter.

Why exactly would a "half naked image" of me go viral anyway?