Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Mostly urban density ideas were incompatible with green space in the decades prior. The more you want to fit people to "lower" rent, the less you can allocate for grass or trees.



I don't know. When thinking about "urban density in decades prior" the first thing that comes to my mind are the "commie blocks" of the 50s-80s. The thinking of those often explicitly included green space: put people in denser higher buildings and you have space for green spaces in between. The execution wasn't always stellar, but it was in no way incompatible with trees.


There were a lot of open spaces in the 60s and 70s, but over the years, "every" space has been converted into utility or new buildings.


I think you misunderstand the commie block. The entire greenspace is part of the property as well. See peter cooper village in nyc.


Things like Cooper village seems to be the exception where I live.


Those projects are common all over the eastern US at least. Western US made them more squat generally a couple stories, but about as much green space surrounding the property. Not often as many trees but the children play outside and leave bikes and toys across the property.


During summers, old commieblocks in my neighborhood look like ships in a sea of trees. High density and lots of greenery can coexist.


Would you mind sharing your location (even vaguely) ? or maybe another place with similar architecture if you prefer.


Feel free to check out the whole neighborhood and courtyards between the buildings: https://www.google.com/maps/@56.0184683,92.8469346,3a,75y,17...




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: