Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Gaussian distributions are a horrible choice for representing measurement uncertainty. If the tool is properly calibrated, 100% of the probability mass will be within (6.9, 7.1). A normal distribution would have probability mass in negative numbers!

There's also no motivation for choosing a normal distribution here - why would we expect the error to be normal?




If the error is the sum of many little errors, as it often is in mechanical assemblies, it's approximately normal due to the central limit theorem.


True, but that’s not how most sensors actually work. For example consider a weighing scale. If it says 10.1kg, why would we use a normal distribution?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: