Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That's no longer the case: Many of the newer single-use ticket ICs (including the MIFARE Ultralight one mentioned in the article) actually support data storage and (very) basic cloning protection.





While it is possible to use advanced features from newer chips, I know more than one actual system where they just use the serial number, even when rolling out more advanced Mifare based cards. So your "that's no longer the case" is a bit too general/optimistic IMO.

And sure, simply using the serial number might pose a security risk depending on the application, but that rarely stops implementors to implement such schemes. More often than not do people believe in security by obscurity, sigh. For a simply ticket system the serial number should be secure enought as it is a use-once application.


That the chips support data storage doesn't mean that that feature is used. There are systems that use MIFARE Ultralight cards for the UID alone just because they are cheap and easily sourced.

Definitely, but my point is that that’s not the only way to do it.

You can also store only an ID in a QR code, but you could also fit more information and a digital signature of it in there.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: