Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is all myth. People don't write Haskell, because they read why other non-Haskellers also don't write Haskell, based on what other non-Haskellers wrote.

> a language which has adapted the best bits and pieces from the functional programming paradigm?

Why write in a statically-typed language when dynamically-typed languages have adapted the best bits and pieces from statically-typed languages?




> Why write in a statically-typed language when dynamically-typed languages have adapted the best bits and pieces from statically-typed languages?

Unfortunately, dynamically-typed languages haven't adapted the best bit from statically-typed languages: that all types are enforced at compile-time!


Yep, that's the parallel I was going for.

Functional languages give you the same output for the same input, and almost-functional languages ... probably give you the same output for the same input?




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: