Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> It's not the device, it's the users' choice in how they use it.

This right here. But I take it in a different way. That tool is mine. I get to chose how it is used. Advertisers seem to think they own some of my time to get 'free things'. Application makers seem to think they own some of my time to try to get more money out of me thru the use of dark patterns. The phone companies seem to think they own some of my time and sell my data because I pay them. Other people seem to think they own my time because I have the thing and should be on call 24/7 whenever they want to get ahold of me.

When they first came up with the idea of the current smart phone. It was really cool. Then I have realized that everyone is using it to grab my time from me. All of them seem to get mad when I set the thing down on a table somewhere and ignore it and enjoy the things I want to do.




I apportion blame a bit differently.

App makers (and mobile phone companies) are competitive marketplaces with alternatives. They're trying to find viable business models to fund feature development and make a profit. Can't fault them for that: users can pick another option.

Who I can fault is mobile OS/platform owners.

It's a duopoly, and they've repeatedly and strategically made user-hostile decisions that strip choice away from mobile device owners.

All of the ills you mentioned wouldn't be ills if OS features enabled user control of them.

Google is obviously the more egregious (user freedom features and need to boost quarterly profits are inversely related), but I don't think Apple would be taking a pro-privacy stance if it conflicted with their business model and they didn't see it as a strategic differentiator.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: