Interesting, I think this is part of what the article is alluding to: what happens with tech debt is more to do with the team’s process rather than with the tech debt itself. Some teams are stuck in a process that makes them unable to tackle the problems even if they want to due to that process.
Of course you could just say “change the process” but it’s also obvious that there are many other factors and pressures that are non trivial
Of course you could just say “change the process” but it’s also obvious that there are many other factors and pressures that are non trivial