> refusing to define what "agile" actually means, and just throwing together a bunch of anecdotes and feelings about excessive meetings and estiybeing misused to measure productivity.
I mean - this seems necessary when the agile manifesto is extremely vague and practitioners can't seem to agree on the One True Way to do agile - and in the absence of formal studies and analysis, what else is there but anecdotes?
I mean - this seems necessary when the agile manifesto is extremely vague and practitioners can't seem to agree on the One True Way to do agile - and in the absence of formal studies and analysis, what else is there but anecdotes?