Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

For WUFFS the language, or for WUFFS the library, or for the WUFFS tooling today?

The clever idea is to have you the programmer in effect write a proof that your code has the desired semantic properties as part of the programming activity and so then the WUFFS transpiler is merely checking that the proof is correct.

This leverages your understanding of what you were trying to do.




Apparently Wuffs only proves safety. Verifying the code does what it's supposed to do is done with unit tests.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: