We must have a different understanding of the English language. OP's sibling comment clarifies your original misunderstanding by saying
> The California law I referenced grants me rights to the pay range information.
You read that and somehow thought, _for the second time_, "I get it. OP wants to know everything about everything." Do you see the disconnect? OP is specifically talking about pay range information. You're just making up an obviously outrageous point that no one is advocating for and arguing against that made-up thing.
Edit: this is reiterated by OP in a sibling comment, guess I framed it correctly?